"I used to think that the people who created (South Africa's) laws that effectively suspended the rule of law were moral barbarians. Now I know they were just pioneers ahead of their time." - JM Coetzee.
Despite winning his initial appeal; the Australian Immigration Minister Alex Hawke decided that the unvaccinated, but yet fully recovered and naturally immune Novak Djokovic is a threat to public health. The Tennis Star has been detained and and his visa is soon to be canceled.
Djokovic now faces a three year visa ban, meaning that be the time that he will be able to play in the Australian Tennis Open again he will be 37 years old and beyond the twilight of his years. Whoever wins the Australian Open this year, simply cannot argue that he competed against the best as the former champion was disqualified on unreasonable grounds.
Using sportsmen as political symbolism is unfortunately nothing new, and punishing them for being disobedient to authority has always been the measure of the brutality in a society. For opposing the Vietnam War draft, Mohammed Ali was fined $10 000, banned from boxing for three years and he also faced a prison sentence.
As with Novak Djokovic today, public and media pressure at the time of the Vietnam Protest was was against Ali. After the dust of the war settled and the US’s war crimes became evident, the establishment found itself in an untenable position. Mohammed Ali was redeemed and today he is seen as a hero for sticking to his conviction.
Today’s “Unvaccinated” who question the ethics behind the mRNA vaccine are being treated in the same way as yesterday’s terrorist were, or a few decades ago when anyone who opposed Imperialism or Apartheid on legitimate grounds were seen as a “Communist Sympathizer”. The “Antitax”, “Conspiracy Theorist” and “Misinformation” pejorative is utilized by the authorities to stigmatize those who ask critical questions, because they know that their position is increasingly untenable.
There are now over 140 Research Studies that show that natural immunity is not only broader, but also superior to the vaccine induced immunity. By ignoring the evidence, it is clear that Australian Government’s actions is based not out of respect for public health, but rather because the political structure does not want to be humiliated for its morally and scientifically unjust position.
What the authorities fear is that the “the unvaccinated” role models might be influencing people to think for themselves and that they might discover that Nobel Lies are being employed in the name of Public Health. It might lead them to question the very legitimacy of the power structures that are operating under the pretense of a Public Health Emergency.
Despite the long brutal and cruel lockdown in Victoria, Internment Camps in the Northern Territories and a the high rates of myocarditis among high intensity athletes, that include the death of a 16 year old powerlifter, the authorities in Australia and elsewhere are keeping to the same old propaganda.
“Vaccinate, Vaccinate and Vaccinate”.
This is not the sign of a society that takes public health seriously, but one that would rather injure its youth and force them to take a product that includes clear evidence of harm for those in a younger cohort.
The Australia’s Government is acting as yet another cruel and barbaric country that are more in line with its historical traditions as the penal colony or when it organized Rugby Tours with the Apartheid Regime in violation of the Glen Eagles Agreement.