Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Anton van der Merwe's avatar

There is a huge difference between a conventional terrorist and Hamas. The latter has committed itself to eliminating all jews from the region. It has also demonstrated numerous times that it is totally committed to that goal. October 7th showed that. You cannot be at peace with people who maintain that view. Dropping it needs to be a precondition. When the PLO accepted that Israel could exist a peace deal followed very quickly. If Hamas revised its charter and accepted Israel's existence a peace deal might follow, but it is difficult to know whether to trust Hamas. Their behaviour in the past two years suggests not.

Isreal withdrew completely from Gaza in 2005 and Hamas took control in 2007. Despite this total withdrawal Hamas has continued to attach Israel from Gaza, targeting civilians more than the military.

Based on this experience how likely is it that Israeli withdrawals from the West Bank would also lead to peace. How would you guaranteed that? Would you continue to tolerate Hamas attacking Israeli civilians from the West Bank but condemn all attempts by Israel to respond to these attacks. Any response to Hamas guarantees major civilian casualiies because they intention used civilians as human shields.

You seem to think Hamas should not be pressured to change its approach while Israel should be.

Your approach effectively ensures that Hamas will continue the same strategy and place Palestinian lives at risk.

While you are well meaning this is well beyond your pay grade. You really need to educate yourself about this complex war before spouting off.

Expand full comment
26 more comments...

No posts