Thanks for this. energy Kevin Mileham unfortunately is a UN IRENA believer who is fully behind the DA sponsors Rupert & Motsepe to implement useless unreliable Renewable Electricity in particular which is entirely dependent on the weather and climatic conditions which are unpredictable and uncontrollable.
The only ones that benefit form this are the industry speculators, product manufacturers, suppliers and installers an political industrial complex.
The consumers pay a heavy price for this as the Government are partners in a PPP scheme that if chock full of subsidies hidden behind secrecy and non-disclosure clauses in the PPA's that are beyond public scrutiny even though it is tax-payers money from whom the IPP's are sole beneficiaries.
The playing filed is skewed in the IPP's favour using legal plunder in fact. They don't produce a commodity that is useful as it cannot be produced as and when needed which is the market demand.
Additional Hidden in plain sight for the sole benefit of the Political Industrial Complex are seen below:
There is an attempt to mask it as a commodity using batteries as storage (BESS Project) which again is sponsored by Tax-payers and that cost is not added to IPP's which it should be, because it is for their sole benefit.
The same applies to the Transmission infrastructure (extensions cords if you will to transport the product to the grid, again which is funded by tax payers, where the sole benefit is for the producers. The IPP's too should be paying for this benefit.
If the above benefit costs were added to the IPP's it would make their pseudo-commodity even more ridiculously expensive than it already is.
Tax-payers should not be paying for a Private industries' profits. So from this we can deduce that tax-payers are in fact paying for Corporate Welfare. State sponsored welfare by means of legal plunder.
Bulk Wind and Solar power farm producers are the intermittent freeloaders on the electricity grid.
They are treated as if they’re generators, adding power to the grid, but instead they provide something the grid doesn’t need — power that can’t be guaranteed. Leeches comes to mind.
The rules for these type of IPP's need to be changed.
The rule should be part of the requirement to be called a producer-generators.
If you wish to sell power into the grid, you will have to guarantee a minimum level of supply and technical quality, guarantee that minimum level of supply 24/7 at the specified power quality, and critically, that minimum level can be no lower than 80 per cent of the maximum amount of energy you will be permitted to sell into the grid. You also I should pay for your own back-up and infrastructure. You must be able to provide the electricity as and when needed by Eskom.
Thanks for this. energy Kevin Mileham unfortunately is a UN IRENA believer who is fully behind the DA sponsors Rupert & Motsepe to implement useless unreliable Renewable Electricity in particular which is entirely dependent on the weather and climatic conditions which are unpredictable and uncontrollable.
The only ones that benefit form this are the industry speculators, product manufacturers, suppliers and installers an political industrial complex.
The consumers pay a heavy price for this as the Government are partners in a PPP scheme that if chock full of subsidies hidden behind secrecy and non-disclosure clauses in the PPA's that are beyond public scrutiny even though it is tax-payers money from whom the IPP's are sole beneficiaries.
The playing filed is skewed in the IPP's favour using legal plunder in fact. They don't produce a commodity that is useful as it cannot be produced as and when needed which is the market demand.
Additional Hidden in plain sight for the sole benefit of the Political Industrial Complex are seen below:
There is an attempt to mask it as a commodity using batteries as storage (BESS Project) which again is sponsored by Tax-payers and that cost is not added to IPP's which it should be, because it is for their sole benefit.
The same applies to the Transmission infrastructure (extensions cords if you will to transport the product to the grid, again which is funded by tax payers, where the sole benefit is for the producers. The IPP's too should be paying for this benefit.
If the above benefit costs were added to the IPP's it would make their pseudo-commodity even more ridiculously expensive than it already is.
Tax-payers should not be paying for a Private industries' profits. So from this we can deduce that tax-payers are in fact paying for Corporate Welfare. State sponsored welfare by means of legal plunder.
Bulk Wind and Solar power farm producers are the intermittent freeloaders on the electricity grid.
They are treated as if they’re generators, adding power to the grid, but instead they provide something the grid doesn’t need — power that can’t be guaranteed. Leeches comes to mind.
The rules for these type of IPP's need to be changed.
The rule should be part of the requirement to be called a producer-generators.
If you wish to sell power into the grid, you will have to guarantee a minimum level of supply and technical quality, guarantee that minimum level of supply 24/7 at the specified power quality, and critically, that minimum level can be no lower than 80 per cent of the maximum amount of energy you will be permitted to sell into the grid. You also I should pay for your own back-up and infrastructure. You must be able to provide the electricity as and when needed by Eskom.